Hi Ivo, Ed, Ed, please fix your Reply-To. On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:03:58 +0200, Ivo Manca wrote: > We (three students from the Netherlands) are running quite a similar project > right now: adding DMI support to sensors-detect, which tries to find a match > with a local-database, then extracts the corresponding configuration. It > sounds quite like the project you made. > > I don't have time to look into the software you made right now, but I will > tonight. But it sounds like it is at least "very useful". > > I wonder what Jean (and ofcourse: everyone else) will think about it, Jean didn't have enough time to look into one project, he hardly has more time looking into two :( So I'll leave it up to you (Ivo and Ed) and Hans to pick the best ideas and come up with one common solution. I really don't think we want to have two or more projects doing the same thing. As Hans underlined earlier, getting the dynamic chips support in libsensors first should address a number of problems. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare
