grafting lm-sensors 2.10.1 onto red hat kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



J. Baron's latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of
lm_sensors as far as I can tell.  I will try to open
a ticket with Red Hat on this.  Thanks

Steve Timm


On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:17:08AM -0600, Steven Timm wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Steven,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors
>>>> 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as
>>>> distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4?
>>>>
>>>> For some of the 2.9 version of lm_sensors there used to be
>>>> lm_sensors-kmdl and i2c-kmdl rpms available in the ATRPMS repository
>>>> but now I do not see those anymore.  any hints are welcome.
>>>
>>> For 2.6 kernels, you don't need the separate module packages,
>>> everything's already in the kernel tree. All you need is the user-space
>>> part of lm_sensors, which is available from ATrpms:
>>> http://atrpms.net/dist/el4/lm_sensors/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I guess what I am really trying to get at here is the following:
>> If I just take the source code for the various modules I want
>> from the lm_sensors 2.10.x tree and patch it into a 2.6.9 kernel,
>> is it going to compile, or is the source code out there only
>> good to compile into 2.4 kernels.
>>
>> Has nobody ever tried to patch the latest lm_sensors code
>> into a 2.6.9. enterprise kernel?  Under enterprise linux 3
>> we used to do this all the time, I don't understand why
>> nobody has tried to do it in Enterprise linux 4.
>
> Of course, that happens from time to time by the distribution
> vendor. I already posted a bugzilla entry of a previous kernel merge:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171507
>
> And if you look into the current src.rpm you'll find the patch to
> 2.6.9 of lm_sensors' code of that time.
>
> What you really want is to notify RH about the need for updating this
> patch against recent lm_sensors' code and hope to get it approved to
> enter the next kernel errata. If you are in a hurry you don't need to
> wait until RH's QA is done, usually the upcoming kernel rpms & patches
> are released at J. Baron's redhat.com web space.
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven C. Timm, Ph.D  (630) 840-8525  timm at fnal.gov  http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
Fermilab Computing Div/Core Support Services Dept./Scientific Computing Section
Assistant Group Leader, Farms and Clustered Systems Group
Lead of Computing Farms Team




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux