Thanks a bunch, Jean. Those changes worked great. The only remaining issue after editing the renames was that an "i2c_detect" call was unresolved. After some poking around, I saw that "i2c_probe" was virtually the same so I renamed that as well. After that, it compiles fine and works great. Thanks again for your help! --- Matt Kulka matt at lqx.net On Feb 10, 2006, at 3:17 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > On 2006-02-09, Matt Kulka wrote: >> I'm attempting to build the lm93 driver on kernel 2.6.14. The patches >> (specifically the 2.6.13-rc3-mm3 version) provided by Eric Bowersox >> patch the appropriate source files successfully. However, building >> fails due to some missing files and undeclared variables, below is >> the output. Is there an appropriate patch for 2.6.14? > > Not that I know of, but others may have worked on it. There have been > some changes in the i2c/hwmon realm since 2.6.13 so I'm not surprised > that the old patch doesn't work anymore. > >> drivers/hwmon/lm93.c:42:30: linux/i2c-sensor.h: No such file or >> directory > > Has been renamed to linux/hwmon.h. > >> drivers/hwmon/lm93.c:43:27: linux/i2c-vid.h: No such file or >> directory > > Has been renamed to linux/hwmon-vid.h. > >> drivers/hwmon/lm93.c:59: warning: type defaults to `int' in >> declaration of `SENSORS_INSMOD_1' > > Has been renamed to I2C_CLIENT_INSMOD_1. > > Just changing these three changes should let you go somewhat further. > Also note that you'll need an additional patch which restores the an > SMBus block read function needed by the lm93 driver: > > http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/i2c/linux-2.6/i2c-add-smbus-block- > read.patch > > Ideally we would merge the lm93 driver into mainline so that users can > just use it, but that's a very large driver which would need some more > review before I can accept it - and I don't have the time for that > review work myself. > > -- > Jean Delvare
