Steven Karatnyk wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
>> Please also keep in mind that for user-space support you need to apply
>> the following patch to the lm_sensors sources:
>> http://jdelvare.net2.nerim.net/sensors/CVS-w83687thf.diff
>> I checked it and it still applies to CVS with some offset.
>>
>
> It Applied without issue, but your wording ("it still applies with
> some offset") makes me think I may have missed something or done
> something wrong here. And indeed, although sensors-detect now detects
> the IC, I haven't succeeded with getting the support implemented yet.
> I will re-look at this later tonight, time permitting.
>
>
Ummmm, lets just say I'm a monkey (i.e. I hadn't modprobe w83627hf ).
Anyways, here's the successful output:
# sensors
lm90-i2c-0-4c
Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000
M/B Temp: +37?C (low = +0?C, high = +70?C)
CPU Temp: +54.4?C (low = +0.0?C, high = +70.0?C)
M/B Crit: +85?C (hyst = +75?C)
CPU Crit: +85?C (hyst = +75?C)
w83687thf-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
in0: +1.10 V (min = +0.70 V, max = +1.87 V)
in1: +1.52 V (min = +2.54 V, max = +2.11 V) ALARM
in2: +3.30 V (min = +2.86 V, max = +1.66 V) ALARM
in3: +2.99 V (min = +2.05 V, max = +3.36 V)
in4: +2.59 V (min = +3.49 V, max = +2.14 V) ALARM
in7: +2.94 V (min = +0.16 V, max = +0.42 V) ALARM
in8: +3.30 V (min = +0.38 V, max = +3.14 V) ALARM
fan1: 1328 RPM (min = 9375 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
fan2: 1339 RPM (min = 1016 RPM, div = 8)
fan3: 0 RPM (min = 6136 RPM, div = 2) ALARM
temp1: +39?C (high = -122?C, hyst = -41?C) sensor = diode ALARM
temp2: +39.0?C (high = +80?C, hyst = +75?C) sensor = diode
temp3: +59.0?C (high = +80?C, hyst = +75?C) sensor = diode
vid: +0.275 V (VRM Version 9.0)
alarms:
beep_enable:
Sound alarm enabled
Pretty happy camper here! Thanks so much guys.
Looking back to what Hugo also reported with the experimental code
(http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-June/012769.html),
on a glance it seems like I get pretty similar results.
Anyways, definitely count me in for testing any revised/changed code as
the result of info gleaned from the data sheet. Looking forward to it!
Thanks, Steven
Sorry - probably a duplicate message...replied from one of my other
accounts (CK) by mistake.
