On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:32:07PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > Well that explains a thing or two, and it certainly was an inconvenience. > > > My server started dying really badly last night at around the time of the > > > first message. 300-odd messages later... > > > > I'm very sorry about this. That's definitely not fair from us after you > > have been so helpful with the archive along the years. > > > > > I run Mailman. If you would like to switch over to a Mailman list, that > > > you can have full administrative control over, let me know. Added bonus > > > is Mailman does its own archiving, automatically. > > > > We have had a similar offer earlier by Axel Thimm, which we are enclined > > to accept. But if it won't happen for some reason, we will certainly > > consider your offer, thanks. > > > > Side question... Do you know if it would be possible to inject the old > > archive into the new Mailman system so that the new archive has both the > > old and new posts? (We definitely can do without this, I'm only > > wondering.) > > Wouldn't be bad. Andrew, do you have an mbox copy of the archives? Thanks! > Okay, I've got a large (750Mish) file at http://www.andrew.net.au/~lm-sensors/lm-sensors.1st_2Gb.bz2 A much smaller (13M) file with the most recent mail will appear at http://www.andrew.net.au/~lm-sensors/lm-sensors at 4pm on Sunday (GMT+10) regards Andrew
