On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:10:37 +0100, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote:
>Hi Grant,
>
>> Is this what you after? Against latest CVS lm_sensors2, let me know
>> if CVS wrong source, please.
>That's almost it, except that this breaks compatibility for the adm1025
>chip. Please leave "in1_ref" as the alternative sysfs file name (last
>member of the structure). If you don't, then people with an ADM1025 chip
>upgrading to lm_sensors 2.9.1 would also need to upgrade their kernel if
>they don't want to lose VID, which is no good.
Fussed about tab/space mix in this file? Lot of noise for little gain?
Cheers,
Grant.
--- lm_sensors2/lib/chips.c 2005-03-16 09:16:05.000000000 +1100
+++ lm_sensors2x/lib/chips.c 2005-03-21 07:37:26.000000000 +1100
@@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@
ADM9240_SYSCTL_TEMP, VALUE(1), 1, "temp1_max", 3 },
{ SENSORS_ADM9240_VID, "vid", NOMAP, NOMAP,
- R, ADM9240_SYSCTL_VID, VALUE(1), 2, "in1_ref", 3 },
+ R, ADM9240_SYSCTL_VID, VALUE(1), 2, "cpu0_vid", 3 },
{ SENSORS_ADM9240_FAN1_DIV, "fan1_div", SENSORS_ADM9240_FAN1,
NOMAP, RW,
ADM9240_SYSCTL_FAN_DIV, VALUE(1), 0 },
@@ -2587,8 +2587,8 @@
{ SENSORS_ADM1025_TEMP2_HIGH, "temp2_high", SENSORS_ADM1025_TEMP2,
SENSORS_ADM1025_TEMP2, RW,
ADM1025_SYSCTL_TEMP, VALUE(1), 1 },
- { SENSORS_ADM1025_VID, "vid", NOMAP, NOMAP,
- R, ADM1025_SYSCTL_VID, VALUE(1), 3 , "in1_ref", 3 },
+ { SENSORS_ADM1025_VID, "vid", NOMAP, NOMAP, R, ADM1025_SYSCTL_VID,
+ VALUE(1), 3 , "cpu0_vid", 3, "in1_ref" },
{ SENSORS_ADM1025_VRM, "vrm", NOMAP, NOMAP,
RW, ADM1025_SYSCTL_VRM, VALUE(1), 1 },
{ SENSORS_ADM1025_ALARMS, "alarms", NOMAP, NOMAP,
