> Hi Jean, > > Hmmm. I'm going to butt in with a suggesstion. Using strace seems to > me to be inherently user unfriendly (but it will of course give up the > required tidbit of information). True, this is user unfriendly and highly valueable for us developers. strace will tell so much more than just where the configuration file is read. Nevertheless... > Would it make sense for sensors to print out the name of the > configuration file as one of the first lines of output? Not as part of the output, where I would consider it noise. However, printing the information as part of "sensors --help" would be great, agreed. I just added that (together with removing the default configuration file locations list, and having only one default configuration file, which sounds sufficent and saner). > Disclaimer: I myself am new to the lm_sensors scene and I've never > actually run sensors on any computer yet. Feel free to voice in and, why not, provide some code if you have other good ideas like this one :) Thanks, -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/
