Jean, How are you concluding my version mismatch? Here is my dmesg output: i2c-core.o: i2c core module version 2.8.7 (20040611) i2c-i801 version 2.8.7 (20040611) i2c-isa.o version 2.8.7 (20040611) i2c-proc.o version 2.8.7 (20040611) adm1025.o version 2.8.7 (20040611) eeprom.o version 2.8.7 (20040611) smsc47m1.o version 2.8.7 (20040611) I installed i2c v2.8.7 with lm_sensors 2.8.7, could there be a mismatch from something already present in the Kernel source? I don't understand where the mismatch is.... I can't recompile my kernel, as it is patched to run some proprietary hardware, and the patch is not available for anything newer. I didn't have i2c support enabled in the kernel, so I used "method 1" to build i2c & lm_sensors. Where did I go wrong? Thanks for the help. Sorry about any problems my "non-ascii-art" caused. It has been disabled. -Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean Delvare" <khali at linux-fr.org> To: "Phil" <phil at mindfart.com> Cc: "LM Sensors" <sensors at stimpy.netroedge.com> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 1:27 PM Subject: Re: Support question: segault in sensors > > I2c modules versions mismatch. Same as tickets 1741 and 1750. > Check versions with dmesg after you loaded the modules. > > Please explain how you installed your kernel, i2c and lm_sensors, and > I'll tell you were you failed. > > At any rate, mixing such an old kernel with such a recent lm_sensors is > not recommended. > > Oh, and would you please avoid ASCII art (or actually non-ASCII art, > which is even worse) in your "From:" field. This is a mailing-list, not > #warlordz. > > Thanks. > > -- > Jean "Khali" Delvare > http://khali.linux-fr.org/ >
