> Maybe I'm missing something but since when <linux/config.h> is not > needed? > > Are you sure this change will not break build on some archs/configs? I am assuming that #include <linux/config.h> is needed if and only if the code makes use of any CONFIG_* value. Am I wrong? > So far my experience has been (at least in 2.4) that usually header > files don't include all required headers themselves, relying on *.c to > include everything properly (maybe it's just on PPC though). Such headers are broken and need fixing IMHO. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
