I'll try the CVS version, but I'm not sure that that is the problem. I had lm_sensors working on this computer before I upgraded to SuSE 9.0 from SuSE 8.2, and at that point I remember that it was a w83781d chip. I have an Asus A7N8X-X, so that is what it's upposed to have. I'll try the it87 though, and let you know how it works. Thanks! ---------- On Monday, March 01, 2004 11:46:43 AM +0100, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: ---------- > [Please reply to the list, not to me] > > Quoting Adam Wolfe Gordon <awolfego at telusplanet.net>: > >> Here is the output of sensors-detect: >> (...) >> Client found at address 0x2d >> (...) >> Client found at address 0x2f >> (...) >> Client found at address 0x48 >> (...) >> Client found at address 0x49 >> (...) >> Client found at address 0x4b > > You do have many unrecognized chips. Dumps would help identifying them, > but see below. > >> Some Super I/O chips may also contain sensors. Super I/O probes >> are typically a bit more dangerous, as we have to write to I/O >> ports to do this. Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? >> (YES/no): >> Probing for `SMSC 47M1xx Super IO Fan Sensors' >> Failed! (0x87) >> Probing for `VT1211 Super IO Sensors' >> Failed! (0x87) >> Probing for `Winbond W83627HF Super IO Sensors' >> Failed! (0x87) >> Probing for `Winbond W83627THF Super IO Sensors' >> Failed! (0x87) >> Probing for `Winbond W83697HF Super IO Sensors' >> Failed! (0x87) > > Most likely you do have an ITE it87xx chipset. Recent versions of > sensors-detect may have found it. I guess you are using an old one. > > Please get lm_sensors CVS and install the user-space tools (make user && > make user_install). Try the new sensors-detect, it should find an it87 > chip, and possibly more. The new Super-I/O detection code is one day > old, you're our first tester ;) > > For all addresses listed above for which the latest version of > sensors-detect did not find anything, you can provide a dump (i2cdump 1 > 0xNN, where NN is each chip address) for analysis. These addresses are > usual for hardware monitoring chips, so they could be new ones we don't > support yet. > > -- > Jean Delvare > http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/ > ---------- End Quoted Message ---------- ---------- Adam Wolfe Gordon Email: awolfego at telusplanet.net Public Key: http://www3.telus.net/awolfego -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040301/14c69abb/attachment.bin
