Hi, Jean Delvare wrote: >>>I don't see any difficulty here. They are in0, in1 and in2. We never >>>give names to the channels, only number. Labels are set with >>>sensors.conf. >> >>Ok, so everything is like before, besides the values beeing unscaled. > > Correct. Please consider updating the 2.4 driver in a similar way once > you're over with the 2.6 driver, so that the same sensors.conf works > with both versions. Ok. >>BTW: I'm not on the ML. > > Want to be? Not yet. Maybe soon, if I get further documentation from Fujitsu-Siemens. >>Ok, but then I should complete the output of sensors for fscher and >>also include alarms and watchdog. > > You wanted to do so anyway, DIDN'T YOU? ;) As I'm now more familar with sensors, shure! >>>You like reading and writing to /proc files directly, don't you? ;) >> >>Maybe, I was just to lazy to look for a different solution. From >>coding the module, I knew that it would work that easy ;-). > > Adding a few lines to sensors.conf isn't that difficult, really. I'd > even find it easier than setting up a startup script that echoes values > to /proc files. But that's a matter of taste I guess. It's time to change to sensors, because it solves dual-boot issues (2.4.x: procfs, 2.6.x: sysfs). Bye. -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl mailto:rnissl at gmx.de
