> > Writing a 1 to the bit so that it is reset is a strange idea, isn't > > it?;) > > Well, how would you indicate the bit to clear otherwise? Sure, I agree. Just found it strange at first, but that's the correct way. > > I don't see any difficulty here. They are in0, in1 and in2. We never > > give names to the channels, only number. Labels are set with > > sensors.conf. > > Ok, so everything is like before, besides the values beeing unscaled. Correct. Please consider updating the 2.4 driver in a similar way once you're over with the 2.6 driver, so that the same sensors.conf works with both versions. > BTW: I'm not on the ML. Want to be? > Ok, but then I should complete the output of sensors for fscher and > also include alarms and watchdog. You wanted to do so anyway, DIDN'T YOU? ;) > > You like reading and writing to /proc files directly, don't you? ;) > > Maybe, I was just to lazy to look for a different solution. From > coding the module, I knew that it would work that easy ;-). Adding a few lines to sensors.conf isn't that difficult, really. I'd even find it easier than setting up a startup script that echoes values to /proc files. But that's a matter of taste I guess. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/