> >> 6. switch_output_format : 2=RGB, 1=SVIDEO, 0=Composite > > JD> Using "format" is a bit confusing IMHO. What about > JD> "output_source"? (Oh well this is maybe even more confusing...) > > Perhaps output_mode ? I thought "source" because that's the term that is used in xawtv when you have to choose between tuner, composite and s-video for input. I admit that output_source sounds a bit strange but input_source (for an hypothetical video decoder chipset) would be correct. This is the reason why I was proposing this. "Mode", as "format", is not explicit enough and could apply to other things as well. I think I'd go for "output_source" because people will probably understand immediately what it represents, although "output" and "source" are somewhat contradictory terms. > JD> Well, without the hardware I probably won't help much - and I > JD> don't really plan to read the full data sheet ;) Don't know what > JD> to do with these. If it's not a "public" think, we don't care > JD> much, except that it might conflict with something else someday... > JD> Do as you want. If it's not widely used, this also mean we can > JD> change it later if needed. > > When I tried it in the past (with a 2.4 kernel) it gave out quite > strange results. I think I'll name it bt869_status[1-3] so that it > doesn't interfere. OK? This is OK for me. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
