thanks for the advice, that was my goal, to test your current tree, and eventually to send you patches. I'll try the usb-2.5. mds Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 07:25:01PM -0500, Mark Studebaker wrote: > >>Greg, >>I think I have enough bandwidth and disk space now to try BK... >>I should start by cloning your tree? > > > If you want to :) > > >>This one bk://kernel.bkbits.net/gregkh/linux/i2c-2.6 > > > That's not currently available, I need to rebuild all of my > kernel.bkbits.net bk trees, as they were wiped when the system was > rebuilt after the breakin on that box. > > >>or this one bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/i2c-2.6 >>or??? > > > Depends on what you want to do. If you want to track my current > development tree, you can use bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/usb-2.5/ > > Despite the name, it has all of the patches submitted to me for i2c, > pci, and usb in it. I then break them out of there and build up a bk > tree for Linus or Marcelo to pull from. Or I make patches out of it, > like I've been doing for the past few days for the sysfs stuff. > > But that tree is not based off of Linus's tree, which is good and bad. > Good in that it's faster to use it than Linus's tree as there are less > changesets in it. Bad in that it's a bit harder to pull patches out of > at times. > > Not to deter you, but I would recommend you try out the usb-2.5 tree for > now. That's what a lot of the usb developers track, and it seems to > work well for them. Watch out for a few odd things that I have in that > tree (lots of extra sysfs and pci hotplug and security patches). > > Also, please go through the bk tutorial on the bk site. It will help > you out a lot in figuring out how things work. If you have any specific > questions, or you want to send me a patch, have me merge it with my > tree, and see how you resolve the patch on your end, please let me know. > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
