On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 09:41:39AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:26:40AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:16:12AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:52:50PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:10:27PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > > > A few months ago, we added a workaround to i2c-piix4 to help it to work > > > > > on a few boards. The fix was ported to 2.6, the patch is here: > > > > > http://linuxusb.bkbits.net:8080/i2c-2.6/patch at 1.1123.21.1 > > > > > > > > > > It since turned out that it also breaks the module for other boards, and > > > > > it even breaks more than it fixes (4 reports since lm_sensors-2.8.1 was > > > > > released). The problem is under investigation by Tom Rini, the author of > > > > > the original fix. > > > > > > > > > > I suggest that you reverse the fix in Linux 2.6 before 2.6.0 is > > > > > released. Once we have enough information to submit a better one (could > > > > > take some time), I'll send a new patch to you. > > > > > > > > Thanks, I've backed this patch out and will send it off to Linus. > > > > > > If it's not too late, how about doing the current work-around (module > > > param to enable the fix) instead? > > > > Sure, got patch? :) > > Here you go: Thanks, I've applied this version instead. greg k-h
