On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:52:50PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:10:27PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > A few months ago, we added a workaround to i2c-piix4 to help it to work > > on a few boards. The fix was ported to 2.6, the patch is here: > > http://linuxusb.bkbits.net:8080/i2c-2.6/patch at 1.1123.21.1 > > > > It since turned out that it also breaks the module for other boards, and > > it even breaks more than it fixes (4 reports since lm_sensors-2.8.1 was > > released). The problem is under investigation by Tom Rini, the author of > > the original fix. > > > > I suggest that you reverse the fix in Linux 2.6 before 2.6.0 is > > released. Once we have enough information to submit a better one (could > > take some time), I'll send a new patch to you. > > Thanks, I've backed this patch out and will send it off to Linus. If it's not too late, how about doing the current work-around (module param to enable the fix) instead? -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20031218/100610c6/attachment.bin
