> For people like me, who want to easily deploy lm_sensors across a > cluster of uniform machines, it's very handy to have a spec file there > so that we can build our own RPMs for specific systems with specific > kernels and configurations. Even though the spec file you had was out > of date, it still saved me a lot of trouble. > > My vote would be to keep the spec files. If nobody wants to maintain > them, call them unsupported or unmaintained. OK, why not. > Who's Axel? I'd be happy to work with him, or just use whatever he > has or recommends. Axel Thimm, the guy behind ATrpms: http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/ He has RPMs for lm_sensors, I guess you'd be interested in his .spec files. > Unified diffs attached. Thanks, will take a look tomorrow. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
