On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:01:11AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > For people like me, who want to easily deploy lm_sensors across a > > cluster of uniform machines, it's very handy to have a spec file there > > so that we can build our own RPMs for specific systems with specific > > kernels and configurations. Even though the spec file you had was out > > of date, it still saved me a lot of trouble. > > > > My vote would be to keep the spec files. If nobody wants to maintain > > them, call them unsupported or unmaintained. > > OK, why not. > > > Who's Axel? I'd be happy to work with him, or just use whatever he > > has or recommends. > > Axel Thimm, the guy behind ATrpms: > http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/ > He has RPMs for lm_sensors, I guess you'd be interested in his .spec > files. The kernel rpms for Fedora Core 1 (labeled as rawhide in the repo) already have 2.8.1 support. Userland lm_sensors needs to be updated, and I wanted to try building the kernel modules there also (otherwise one may miss a few). If I make lm_sensors.spec a specfile for kernel modules it will probably become unreadable. Any help in packaging is appreciated! BTW does lm_sensors 2.8.1 (userland & kernel modules) require i2c 2.8.1 or is i2c 2.8.0 already adequate? If the latter is true it would save me from rebuilding the RH7.3-RH9 kernels. -- Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20031031/059a4217/attachment.bin
