> > Yes, it works fine, though I have modified it quite a lot. > > The version I got with the 2.8.0 release had four repeats > > of essentially the same code, apart from register addresses, > > so I merged them into a single function. > > I then added some extra status information. I was planning to > > look at the latest in CVS on Monday or Tuesday to see if I had > > duplicated any effort before offering this code back. > > Heh - the latest code in CVS has exactly the same changes, almost > word for word, as I had made. So I have junked my code and am > using the CVS version instead. Although I don't like the idea of duplicated work very much, it's great to see we came to the same point :) > It continues to work just fine, within the limits of testing: > we use the /proc interface to look at sensor values, but none > of the application level stuff like sensors-detect - we made > the boards, so we already know what chips are on them :-) If it works for you, that's great. Let me (or us) know if you need any additional feature, or whatever. I think the driver if almost complete, but sometimes users need to setup things in a way we wouldn't have thought of. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
