On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Petr Mladek wrote: > The possibility to re-enable a registered patch was useful for immediate > patches where the livepatch module had to stay until the system reboot. > The improved consistency model allows to achieve the same result by > unloading and loading the livepatch module again. > > Also we are going to add a feature called atomic replace. It will allow > to create a patch that would replace all already registered patches. > The aim is to handle dependent patches more securely. It will obsolete > the stack of patches that helped to handle the dependencies so far. > Then it might be unclear when a cumulative patch re-enabling is safe. > > It would be complicated to support the many modes. Instead we could > actually make the API and code easier to understand. > > Therefore, remove the two step public API. All the checks and init calls > are moved from klp_register_patch() to klp_enabled_patch(). Also the patch > is automatically freed, including the sysfs interface when the transition > to the disabled state is completed. > > As a result, there is never a disabled patch on the top of the stack. > Therefore we do not need to check the stack in __klp_enable_patch(). > And we could simplify the check in __klp_disable_patch(). > > Also the API and logic is much easier. It is enough to call > klp_enable_patch() in module_init() call. The patch can be disabled > by writing '0' into /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled. Then the module > can be removed once the transition finishes and sysfs interface is freed. > > The only problem is how to free the structures and kobjects safely. > The operation is triggered from the sysfs interface. We could not put > the related kobject from there because it would cause lock inversion > between klp_mutex and kernfs locks, see kn->count lockdep map. > > Therefore, offload the free task to a workqueue. It is perfectly fine: > > + The patch can no longer be used in the livepatch operations. > > + The module could not be removed until the free operation finishes > and module_put() is called. > > + The operation is asynchronous already when the first > klp_try_complete_transition() fails and another call > is queued with a delay. > > Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx> Miroslav