On Wed 2018-10-17 13:17:56, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:37:03PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > The definition of struct klp_func might be a bit confusing.
> > The original function is defined by name as a string.
> > The new function is defined by name as a function pointer
> > casted to unsigned long.
> >
> > This patch adds helper macros that hide the different types.
> > The functions are defined just by the name. For example:
>
> On one hand, these macros are kind of nice, because they do the function
> pointer casting for the user.
>
> On the other hand, they hide the field names, which hurts readability a
> bit. For example, it would be easy to accidentally assign the wrong
> callback function.
I am not a big fan of the macros either.
> Also, it's unfortunate that these macros are needed in the first place.
>
> What if we just change new_addr (and old_addr) to be 'void *'? Then the
> macros wouldn't be as useful, and we could just get rid of them.
Hmm, I wonder if any change make sense then. The above proposal might
just exchange one confusion with another one:
+ I would expect that a variable called addr is of the type
unsigned long
+ we would need casting when calling ftrace API
+ .new_addr = function_xxx looks a bit weird and it will
be used many times in all livepatch sources.
That said I could live with any solution. The livepatch code
is complicated from other reasons. This is only small detail
from my (today's ;-) point of view.
Best Regards,
Petr
