[working on V2 with your feedback] On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:04:33PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:33:52 +0100 > Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Shouldn't this be an error? The option -fpatchable-function-entry has > > >> been added to the CC_FLAGS_FTRACE, so any call to the compiler is gonna > > >> break anyway. Or am I missing something? This should be the case. > OK, I see what you mean. If the resulting build wont boot, then yes > this should be an error and not a warning. No, there won't be a binary because the first gcc invocation with CC_FLAGS_FTRACE will error out. The alternatives are a makefile-warning followed by a gcc-error or just a makefile-error. The makefile warning or error should hint at the causing config option, that's the key point. Beyond that I don't have any preference. Torsten
