Re: [PATCH v8 7/8] livepatch: Correctly handle atomic replace for not yet loaded modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:54:16AM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > I think this problem is contained to only replacement patches that need
> > the nop-revert feature... if the replacement patch provides a new
> > function definition, then it shouldn't be affected.
> > 
> > Man, we need a regression test suite for all these cases :)
> 
> Any volunteer?

I'd strongly prefer that we get such selftests in place before merging
any more major features...

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux