Hi,
here it is. The first patch is only code removal and appropriate changes
in the documentation. The second patch is maybe more interesting. Do you
agree to do it this way, or have you got a better idea?
Miroslav Benes (2):
livepatch: Remove immediate feature
livepatch: Allow loading modules on architectures without
HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.txt | 84 ++++++++--------------------
include/linux/livepatch.h | 4 --
kernel/livepatch/core.c | 19 ++-----
kernel/livepatch/transition.c | 49 ++--------------
samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-demo.c | 15 -----
samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.c | 15 -----
samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c | 15 -----
samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix2.c | 15 -----
8 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
--
2.15.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
