On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote: > > 3. Drop immediate. It causes problems only and its advantages on x86_64 > > are theoretical. You would still need to solve the interaction with atomic > > replace on other architecture with immediate preserved, but that may be > > easier. Or we can be aggressive and drop immediate completely. The force > > transition I proposed earlier could achieve the same. > > I like this idea. When can we expect v3 of the force patches? :-) Hopefully soon. First I wanted to eliminate the amount of unreaded/unreviewed patches. Almost there. However there is OSS next week :/. But soon... :) Miroslav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
