On 09/27/2017 07:49 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2017-08-31 10:53:53, Joe Lawrence wrote:
>> Log a few kernel debug messages at the beginning of the following livepatch
>> transition functions:
>>
>> klp_complete_transition()
>> klp_cancel_transition()
>> klp_init_transition()
>> klp_reverse_transition()
>>
>> Also update the log notice message in klp_start_transition() for similar
>> verbiage as the above messages.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> kernel/livepatch/transition.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
>> index 53887f0bca10..3d44a3cf27be 100644
>> --- a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
>> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
>> @@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ static void klp_complete_transition(void)
>> unsigned int cpu;
>> bool immediate_func = false;
>>
>> + pr_debug("'%s': completing %s transition\n",
>> + klp_transition_patch->mod->name,
>> + klp_target_state == KLP_PATCHED ? "patching" : "unpatching");
>> +
>> if (klp_target_state == KLP_UNPATCHED) {
>> /*
>> * All tasks have transitioned to KLP_UNPATCHED so we can now
>> @@ -163,6 +167,9 @@ void klp_cancel_transition(void)
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(klp_target_state != KLP_PATCHED))
>> return;
>>
>> + pr_debug("'%s': canceling transition, unpatching\n",
>
> This sentence is a bit confusing. It is related to the Mirek's concern
> about that the following message would be "completing unpatching transition".
>
> What about using something like:
>
> pr_debug("'%s': canceling patching transition, going to unpatch\n",
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
Yeah, what I had was more of a comma splice for brevity... no problem
adopting a clearer wording as you suggested.
Thanks
-- Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
