On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 03:13:05AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 12:06:47PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Create a simple predicate to determine if two xfs_names are the same
> > objects or have the exact same name. The comparison is always case
> > sensitive.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h | 9 +++++++++
> > fs/xfs/scrub/dir.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h
> > index 7d7cd8d808e4d..ac3c264402dda 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,15 @@ struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr;
> > extern const struct xfs_name xfs_name_dotdot;
> > extern const struct xfs_name xfs_name_dot;
> >
> > +static inline bool
> > +xfs_dir2_samename(
> > + const struct xfs_name *n1,
> > + const struct xfs_name *n2)
> > +{
> > + return n1 == n2 || (n1->len == n2->len &&
> > + !memcmp(n1->name, n2->name, n1->len));
>
> Nit, but to me the formatting looks weird, why not:
>
> return n1 == n2 ||
> (n1->len == n2->len && !memcmp(n1->name, n2->name, n1->len));
>
> Or even more verbose:
>
> if (n1 == n2)
> return true;
> if (n1->len != n2->len)
> return false;
> return !memcmp(n1->name, n2->name, n1->len);
Yeah, I'll do that instead of the multiline thing.
> Otherwise this looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Thanks!
--D
