Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: create a predicate to determine if two xfs_names are the same

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 12:06:47PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Create a simple predicate to determine if two xfs_names are the same
> objects or have the exact same name.  The comparison is always case
> sensitive.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h |    9 +++++++++
>  fs/xfs/scrub/dir.c       |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h
> index 7d7cd8d808e4d..ac3c264402dda 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,15 @@ struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr;
>  extern const struct xfs_name	xfs_name_dotdot;
>  extern const struct xfs_name	xfs_name_dot;
>  
> +static inline bool
> +xfs_dir2_samename(
> +	const struct xfs_name	*n1,
> +	const struct xfs_name	*n2)
> +{
> +	return n1 == n2 || (n1->len == n2->len &&
> +			    !memcmp(n1->name, n2->name, n1->len));

Nit, but to me the formatting looks weird, why not:

	return n1 == n2 ||
		(n1->len == n2->len && !memcmp(n1->name, n2->name, n1->len));

Or even more verbose:

	if (n1 == n2)
		return true;
	if (n1->len != n2->len)
		return false;
	return !memcmp(n1->name, n2->name, n1->len);

Otherwise this looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux