On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 09:20:52 AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:44:00 +0800 Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> But please pick the following patch[1] as well, which fixes failures of >> xfs55[0-2] cases. >> >> [1] >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20230913102942.601271-1-ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx > > I guess I can take that xfs patch, as it fixes a DAX patch. I hope the xfs team > are watching. > > But > > a) I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs and > > b) the changelog fails to describe the userspace-visible effects of > the bug, so I (and others) are unable to determine which kernel > versions should be patched. > > Please update that changelog and resend? I will apply "xfs: correct calculation for agend and blockcount" patch to xfs-linux Git tree and include it for the next v6.6 pull request to Linus. At the outset, It looks like I can pick "mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE for unbind" (i.e. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20230928103227.250550-1-ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u) patch for v6.7 as well. But that will require your Ack. Please let me know your opinion. Also, I will pick "xfs: drop experimental warning for FSDAX" patch for v6.7. -- Chandan
