Re: [PATCH] xfs: drop experimental warning for FSDAX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 07:55:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 04:33:04PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Any comments?
> > 
> > I notice that xfs/55[0-2] still fail on my fakepmem machine:
> > 
> > --- /tmp/fstests/tests/xfs/550.out	2023-09-23 09:40:47.839521305 -0700
> > +++ /var/tmp/fstests/xfs/550.out.bad	2023-09-24 20:00:23.400000000 -0700
> > @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ Format and mount
> >  Create the original files
> >  Inject memory failure (1 page)
> >  Inject poison...
> > -Process is killed by signal: 7
> >  Inject memory failure (2 pages)
> >  Inject poison...
> > -Process is killed by signal: 7
> > +Memory failure didn't kill the process
> > 
> > (yes, rmap is enabled)
> 
> Yes, I see the same failures, too. I've just been ignoring them
> because I thought that all the memory failure code was still not
> complete....

Oh, I bet we were supposed to have merged this

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20230828065744.1446462-1-ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx/

to complete the pmem media failure handling code.  Should we (by which I
mostly mean Shiyang) ask Chandan to merge these two patches for 6.7?

--D

> -Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux