On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 09:20:52AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:44:00 +0800 Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > But please pick the following patch[1] as well, which fixes failures of > > xfs55[0-2] cases. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20230913102942.601271-1-ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx > > I guess I can take that xfs patch, as it fixes a DAX patch. I hope the xfs team > are watching. > > But > > a) I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs and > > b) the changelog fails to describe the userspace-visible effects of > the bug, so I (and others) are unable to determine which kernel > versions should be patched. > > Please update that changelog and resend? That's a purely xfs patch anyways. The correct maintainer is Chandan, not Andrew. /me notes that post-reorg, patch authors need to ask the release manager (Chandan) directly to merge their patches after they've gone through review. Pull requests of signed tags are encouraged strongly. Shiyang, could you please send Chandan pull requests with /all/ the relevant pmem patches incorporated? I think that's one PR for the "xfs: correct calculation for agend and blockcount" for 6.6; and a second PR with all the non-bugfix stuff (PRE_REMOVE and whatnot) for 6.7. --D
