On 11/2/21 4:24 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:24:14PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:13:22AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:39:11PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
>>>> +static inline
>>>> +void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio, int i)
>>>
>>> Please fix the weird prototype formatting here.
>>
>> I dunno, it looks weirder this way:
>>
>> -static inline
>> -void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio, int i)
>> +static inline void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio,
>> + int i)
>>
>> Anyway, I've made that change, but I still prefer it the way I had it.
>
> I /think/ Christoph meant:
>
> static inline void
> bio_first_folio(...)
>
> Though the form that you've changed it to is also fine.
I won't speak for Christoph, but basically everything else in block
follows the:
static inline void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio,
int i)
{
}
format, and this one should as well.
--
Jens Axboe
