Re: [PATCH 12/12] xfs: rearrange xfs_inode_walk_ag parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 07:54:45PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The perag structure already has a pointer to the xfs_mount, so we don't
> need to pass that separately and can drop it.  Having done that, move
> iter_flags so that the argument order is the same between xfs_inode_walk
> and xfs_inode_walk_ag.  The latter will make things less confusing for a
> future patch that enables background scanning work to be done in
> parallel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c |    9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> index baf59087caa5..fbd77467bb4d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> @@ -797,13 +797,13 @@ xfs_inode_walk_ag_grab(
>   */
>  STATIC int
>  xfs_inode_walk_ag(
> -	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
>  	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
> +	int			iter_flags,
>  	int			(*execute)(struct xfs_inode *ip, void *args),
>  	void			*args,
> -	int			tag,
> -	int			iter_flags)
> +	int			tag)
>  {
> +	struct xfs_mount	*mp = pag->pag_mount;
>  	uint32_t		first_index;
>  	int			last_error = 0;
>  	int			skipped;
> @@ -932,8 +932,7 @@ xfs_inode_walk(
>  	ag = 0;
>  	while ((pag = xfs_inode_walk_get_perag(mp, ag, tag))) {
>  		ag = pag->pag_agno + 1;
> -		error = xfs_inode_walk_ag(mp, pag, execute, args, tag,
> -				iter_flags);
> +		error = xfs_inode_walk_ag(pag, iter_flags, execute, args, tag);
>  		xfs_perag_put(pag);
>  		if (error) {
>  			last_error = error;
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux