On 3/12/20 9:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Eric and others, > > I've recently tried to port my attr cleanups to xfsprogs, but noticed > that a lot of patches from others are missing before I could apply > my ptches. Any chance we could try to have a real xfsprogs for-next > branch that everyone can submit their ports to in a timely fashion? > Without that I'm not sure how to handle the porting in a distributed > way. I guess the problem is that libxfs/ is behind, right. I have indeed always been late with that but it's mostly only affected me so far. Would it help to open a libxfs-sync-$VERSION branch as soon as the kernel starts on a new version? I've never quite understood what the common expectation for a "for-next" branch behavior is, though I recognize that my use of it right now is a bit unconventional. -Eric
