On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 05:32:26PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:03:16AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > There is no point in applying extent size hints for always COW inodes, > > as we would just have to COW any extra allocation beyond the data > > actually written. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Looks ok, I guess? > > By the way, what's the plan for always_cow inodes, seeing as it's still > only a debugging feature? Support for zoned devices and an O_ATOMIC-like mode that supports data integrity safe overwrites. I've found some time to spend on both lately, but the former might land on the list first.
