On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:03:16AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There is no point in applying extent size hints for always COW inodes, > as we would just have to COW any extra allocation beyond the data > actually written. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Looks ok, I guess? By the way, what's the plan for always_cow inodes, seeing as it's still only a debugging feature? Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> --D > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > index 18f4b262e61c..2e94deb4610a 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ xfs_extlen_t > xfs_get_extsz_hint( > struct xfs_inode *ip) > { > + /* > + * No point in aligning allocations if we need to COW to actually > + * write to them. > + */ > + if (xfs_is_always_cow_inode(ip)) > + return 0; > if ((ip->i_d.di_flags & XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSIZE) && ip->i_d.di_extsize) > return ip->i_d.di_extsize; > if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) > -- > 2.20.1 >