On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 04:41:03PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 5/10/19 3:18 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > There are a ton of "libxfs_" prefixed functions in libxfs/trans.c which > > are only called internally by code in libxfs/ - As I understand it, > > these should probably be just "xfs_" functions, and indeed many > > of them have counterparts in the kernel libxfs/ code. This is one > > small step towards better sync-up of some of the misc libxfs/* > > transaction code with kernel code. > > I should have changed internal callers too, will resend after other > review. I have to admit I never got this whole libxfs renaming. Why can't we just use the xfs_* namespace for libxfs as well to start with?
