> Given that it had no license text on it at all, it "defaults" to GPLv2, > so the GPLv2 SPDX identifier was added to it. > > No copyright was changed, nothing at all happened except we explicitly > list the license of the file, instead of it being "implicit" before. Well if Christoph owns the copyright (if there is one) and he has stated he believes it is too trivial to copyright then it needs an SPDX tag that indicates the rightsholder has stated it's too trivial to copyright and (by estoppel) revoked any right they might have to pursue a claim. I'm sure there's a correct SPDX tag for that ;-) Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
