On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:20:40PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > NAK, for both the libxfs patch and the kernel one. What libxfs patch? And what "kernel one" are you referring to here? > I wrote the file and it has no copyright header because it conatians > trivial, non-copyrightable code. What file exactly? And from what I know, there is nothing that is "non-copyrightable". And this isn't changing the copyright of _ANYTHING_ it is just putting the explicit license of the file, on each file in the kernel, because it needs to be tracked. > I don't know why people think they can touch license information on > files I've written without even asking me. Nothing was changed, the license should be the exact same as it was before. But as I don't know what file you are referring to here, it's a bit hard to determine what you are talking about exactly :( thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
