On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:39:40AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:20:40PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > NAK, for both the libxfs patch and the kernel one. > > What libxfs patch? And what "kernel one" are you referring to here? > > > I wrote the file and it has no copyright header because it conatians > > trivial, non-copyrightable code. > > What file exactly? > > And from what I know, there is nothing that is "non-copyrightable". > > And this isn't changing the copyright of _ANYTHING_ it is just putting > the explicit license of the file, on each file in the kernel, because it > needs to be tracked. > > > I don't know why people think they can touch license information on > > files I've written without even asking me. > > Nothing was changed, the license should be the exact same as it was > before. But as I don't know what file you are referring to here, it's a > bit hard to determine what you are talking about exactly :( fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_cksum.h --D > > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
