Re: XFS and sector size on thin volumes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 12-09-2017 07:24 Gionatan Danti ha scritto:
Hi Eric,
so no performance decrease is expected by letting the journal to be
aligned to 512 byte boundary, even on an underlying 512e/4K disk?

Thanks.

Hi all and sorry for the bump...

So, just to be sure: there is *no* performance penalty in creating an XFS filesystem with 512B sector size on a 512e/4Kn disk (which is not recognized as an AF disk due to the ZVOL in-between)?

Or should I use "-b size=4k" with mkfs.xfs?

Thanks.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux