Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: fix the same_inode check in xfs_file_share_range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:05:18PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The VFS i_ino is an unsigned long, while XFS inode numbers are 64-bit
> wide, so checking i_ino for equality could lead to rate false positives
> on 32-bit architectures.  Just compare the inode pointers themselves
> to be safe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 20563f2..012a960 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ xfs_file_share_range(
>  	    IS_SWAPFILE(inode_out))
>  		return -ETXTBSY;
>  
> -	same_inode = (inode_in->i_ino == inode_out->i_ino);
> +	same_inode = (inode_in == inode_out);
>  
>  	/* Don't reflink dirs, pipes, sockets... */
>  	if (S_ISDIR(inode_in->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode_out->i_mode))
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux