On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:05:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The VFS already does the check, and the placement of this duplicate is in > the way of the following locking rework. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > index a314fc7..20563f2 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > @@ -1003,9 +1003,6 @@ xfs_file_share_range( > IS_SWAPFILE(inode_out)) > return -ETXTBSY; > > - /* Reflink only works within this filesystem. */ > - if (inode_in->i_sb != inode_out->i_sb) > - return -EXDEV; > same_inode = (inode_in->i_ino == inode_out->i_ino); > > /* Don't reflink dirs, pipes, sockets... */ > -- > 2.1.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
