Re: pkeys: Support setting access rights for signal handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:36AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 12/13/2017 12:13 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> 
> >On POWER, the value of the pkey_read() i.e contents the AMR
> >register(pkru equivalent), is always the same regardless of its
> >context; signal handler or not.
> >
> >In other words, the permission of any allocated key will not
> >reset in a signal handler context.
> 
> That's certainly the simpler semantics, but I don't like how they
> differ from x86.
> 
> Is the AMR register reset to the original value upon (regular)
> return from the signal handler?

The AMR bits are not touched upon (regular) return from the signal
handler.

If the signal handler changes the bits in the AMR, they will continue
to be so, even after return from the signal handler.

To illustrate with an example, lets say AMR value is 'x' and signal
handler is invoked.  The value of AMR will be 'x' in the context of the
signal handler.  On return from the signal handler the value of AMR will
continue to be 'x'. However if signal handler changes the value of AMR
to 'y', the value of AMR will be 'y' on return from the signal handler.


> 
> >I was not aware that x86 would reset the key permissions in signal
> >handler.  I think, the proposed behavior for PKEY_ALLOC_SETSIGNAL should
> >actually be the default behavior.
> 
> Note that PKEY_ALLOC_SETSIGNAL does something different: It requests
> that the kernel sets the access rights for the key to the bits
> specified at pkey_alloc time when the signal handler is invoked.  So
> there is still a reset with PKEY_ALLOC_SETSIGNAL, but to a different
> value.  It did not occur to me that it might be desirable to avoid
> resetting the value on a per-key basis.

Ah. ok i see the subtle difference proposed by your semantics.

Will the following behavior work?

'No bits will be reset to its initial value unless the key has been
allocated with PKEY_ALLOC_*RE*SETSIGNAL flag'.

> 
> Thanks,
> Florian

-- 
Ram Pai

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-x86_64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ia64]     [Linux Kernel]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]
  Powered by Linux