On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > >> Just now I am trying to define which MAC features required by ZigBee exist > > >> and which are missing. > > > > > > many. > > > > I know... For now it looks like not using Linux wpan is simpler than use it. > > > > correct. > > > > > > >> > > >> Which WPAN sources I need to look into? > > >> Is it official Linux kernel? > > >> Is it in https://github.com/linux-wpan/linux-wpan-next ? > > > > > > Yes it is. > > > > > > master: things which should be mainline. > > > testing: patches for integrating process. > > > > ok, thanks. > > > > > > > >> Which branch? > > >> > > >> Is serial protocol v.2 already implemented? > > > > > > No, also v1 isn't mainline. > > > > Yes, I already found a patch for v1. > > What i definitely need from the serial protocol is ability to do indirect send. > > > > indirect send? > > > > > > >> What do you think about its modification if it will be necessary for > > >> ZigBee? It will be, for sure... > > >> > > > > > > mac802.15.4 isn't in an useable state. I am currently try to change it > > > look in the rework branch. > > > > wpan_rework_rfc? > > > > Yes, but it's not in a mainline state. I disabled for integrating > process the 802.15.4 address family. For ZigBee userspace stuff you need > definitely af802154. I could give you the advice to make everything on > 802.15.4 RAW sockets. DGRAM sockets are only for data frames and the userspace > API will be changed eventually. > Okay, netlink interface will definitely be changed in future. Sorry. - Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
