On 11/16/2012 02:28 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 17:39 +0530, Mahesh Palivela wrote:
vht regulatory code already posted long back. After went through several
back n forth emails from Luis Rodriguez, accepted the patch.
But not commited anywhere.
Now I have to change that to match to new structs like chan_def etc from
the vht channel work patches you posted 5 days back.
Also helper funcs to replace chan->flags bit checking to dynamically
check channel through regulatory
Yeah, actually I'm not sure it's that easy. We'll also need per
bandwidth TX power restrictions, raise the 40 MHz bandwidth restriction
to 160 MHz (or get rid of it entirely), etc. That seems to require a new
regulatory database format?
Luis discussed the regulatory framework during the wireless summit in
Barcelona last week. My (possibly limited) recollection was that the
current regulatory code can accommodate VHT limits as well. I assume
that also includes the regulatory database format.
Gr. AvS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
