On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 17:39 +0530, Mahesh Palivela wrote: > vht regulatory code already posted long back. After went through several > back n forth emails from Luis Rodriguez, accepted the patch. > But not commited anywhere. > Now I have to change that to match to new structs like chan_def etc from > the vht channel work patches you posted 5 days back. > > Also helper funcs to replace chan->flags bit checking to dynamically > check channel through regulatory Yeah, actually I'm not sure it's that easy. We'll also need per bandwidth TX power restrictions, raise the 40 MHz bandwidth restriction to 160 MHz (or get rid of it entirely), etc. That seems to require a new regulatory database format? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html