On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 21:37 +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 15:02 +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote: > > > >> >> I'm not sure I got your question, but just in case, rfkill is > >> >> initialized to all zeroes so rfkill->state is 0 and on each consequent > >> >> _real_ change there (prev != curr) == true and the event will be > >> >> generated. > >> > > >> > But maybe applications were expecting an event for registration? Or do > >> > we get that anyway maybe? > >> > >> We should get them anyway. rfkill_fop_open() basically just pushes all > >> the startup events into the list so the application will see all the > >> _changes_ on registration. And at least wpa_supplicant reads out all > >> these events on rfkill registration. If an application does something > >> else, then I think it's buggy. > > > > Aha, good point. I guess I'll apply the patch then :) > > provided that I don't see the patch merged, is there anything else we > should take care of before it's considered good enough? No, my mistake ... applied now. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
