Hi Henrique, On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Sep 2012, Vitaly Wool wrote: > > Prevent unnecessary rfkill event generation when the state has > > not actually changed. These events have to be delivered to > > relevant userspace processes, causing these processes to wake > > up and do something while they could as well have slept. This > > obviously results in more CPU usage, longer time-to-sleep-again > > and therefore higher power consumption. > > Could this supress the first event when a switch is registered? Would that > be a concern? I'm not sure I got your question, but just in case, rfkill is initialized to all zeroes so rfkill->state is 0 and on each consequent _real_ change there (prev != curr) == true and the event will be generated. ~Vitaly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
