On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 18:38 +0530, Mahesh Palivela wrote: > > We might need 20MHZ_NOHT or something? > > Yes, I missed that. > 20MHZ_NOHT in 5G band and legacy operation 2.4G band may be 5MHZ. We don't support 5/10 MHz (yet anyway), so we don't have to worry about that. > > Those shouldn't be necessary, I think? The secondary 80 MHz channel > > can't have a control channel, it seems, and the width should be the same > > as well? Plus this is only allowed in 80+80 anyway. > 11ac d3.0 spec section 8.4.2.10 says > > An operating class for an 80+80 MHz channel bandwidth is expressed by > two consecutive Operating/Sub- > band Sequences, where the first Operating/Subband Sequence field > contains an Operating Triplet for an > 80 MHz Channel Spacing with an 80+ Behavior Limit and the second > Operating/Subband Sequence field > contains an Operating Triplet for an 80 MHz Channel Spacing without an > 80+ Behavior Limit. > > so country might allow primary chan to fall in other frequency segment? Yes, but how's that related to how you specify the channel? joahnnes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
